Download your RS14 Checklist 

Since May 2015, when the first re-appearance of coal workers pneumoconiosis (CWP) was detected, the Regulator, Industry and Unions have all taken up the challenge to reduce worker exposures to Respirable Coal Dust.

Following completion of the Sims review, tripartite groups collaborated to produce the findings within this report. Interim and ongoing changes have since been made to the health surveillance system.

Regulatory changes to the way Industry assesses and controls the risk of coal dust exposure has remained unchanged.

Until now that is…

A new Recognised Standard 14 (QLD), Monitoring Respirable Dust in Coal Mines has been released. A standard for the Queensland Coal Industry to adhere to in the monitoring, reporting and investigation of worker exposure to respirable coal dust.

This article seeks to explain some of the key initiatives that the Recognised Standard 14 (‘the Standard’) has introduced to the QLD Coal Mining sector.

So what has changed?

As a whole, the Standard has formalised the requirements that the vast majority of QLD mines have already put in place. This has been a progressive journey for the sector over the last 10 years while Occupational Hygiene programs have matured. 

During that time, industry specialists have helped to shape what has since become industry practice for managing occupational hygiene risks.

The Standard is a useful tool to clarify that approach for assessing exposures, enabling mines to focus on the most important thing, controlling exposure to mine workers.

The Standard (available here) outlines the accountabilities that the Site Senior Executive (SSE) holds. It applies to all underground coal and surface coal operations and is inclusive of all activities on the mine lease.  Although it focuses heavily on monitoring respirable coal dust exposures, the Standard strongly promotes the programs to be control focused.

The purpose of the Recognised Standard 14: Monitoring of Respirable Dust in Coal Mines (‘the Standard’) is to provide the coal mining sector minimum requirements that shall be included in the site safety and health management system to manage the risk of exposure to mine workers.

The standard is based on a risk management model similar to the principles currently in place at your operation.

GCG - New Cole Standard Graphic - Proof V5
GCG undertook a high-level gap analysis on the new standard against current industry practices, where the below changes were identified as the most significant changes for industry to be aware of:

Table 1 – Significant changes from industry practice

Risk based exposure monitoring plansPersonal exposure monitoring programs are to be designed to a specified model and reviewed by a competent person (i.e. COH).
95% Upper Confidence Level (UCL) for exposure assessmentThe UCL 95% is to be used for assessing the risk for each relevant SEG onsite. This metric is derived from statistical analysis and should be reviewed annually as a minimum. For help with the UCL, see our help article.
External Reporting
  • Individual exceedances must be reported to the Regulator and Trade Union within specified timeframes. Exceedance investigations must also be performed and documented.
  • All exposure monitoring data is to be reported quarterly to the Regulator in a specified format.
Single exceedance re-testing 14 daysEach single exceedance for respirable coal dust is to be re-sampled within 14 days. There’s a specific reporting and actioning protocol for this.
ControlsThe Standard is for monitoring respirable dust, however, there is a clear requirement to monitor the performance of controls. Gathering evidence to feed into any investigations will be highly beneficial.

It is important to note that this standard has not clarified how to determine compliance with the occupational exposure standard for respirable coal dust. However, it is clear that each site is required to measure their own performance against the 95% UCL.

Considering the context of the document, the pathway to success clearly lies in controlling worker exposures.

To enable this, a documented control program should be running parallel to your monitoring program. This should be accessible at any time to pro-actively seek and document failures in your dust control systems that could lead to non-compliance with the 95% UCL and/or single exceedances. Supporting this through realtime monitoring can be hugely successful.

Should you require any assistance during the transition of this standard, we would be delighted to help.

Feel free to contact us to talk with a Senior Occupational Hygiene Consultant. 

Australia wide: 1300 424 474 

News & Media

Reduction of Workplace Exposure Standards for Silica and Coal Dust

Reduction of Workplace Exposure Standards for Silica and Coal Dust Australian Ministers recently agreed to reduce the workplace exposure standards (WES) for respirable coal dust and respirable crystalline silica to the levels that were proposed by Safe Work Australia (SWA) earlier in 2019. Background on the WES Review In 2018, SWA developed and documented a methodology to review the existing list from 1995 of adopted national exposure standards…

News & Media

Safe Work Australia: New Workplace Exposure Standard for Respirable Dust

Background of the new Workplace Exposure Standard for Respirable Dust On the 18 February 2019, Safe Work Australia (SWA) released two recommended workplace exposure standard (WES) values for Respirable Crystalline Silica, and Respirable Coal Dust, which will impact our clients who regularly deal with these forms of dust. The documents within the links above provide further detail regarding the current recommendations and basis for WES, discussions and conclusions, and some primary…

News & Media

Melioidosis: A Cause for Concern in Northern Queensland

Melioidosis in Townsville (Image Taken From Brisbane Times) In light of the devastating flood in the tropic region, GCG would like to spread awareness to those affected about a disease called Melioidosis, caused by bacteria found in contaminated water and soil. The cleanup and rectification from the recent flooding in Townsville continues, with heavy assistance from GCG consultants who were stationed in the region. Adding to a challenging situation, cases…

News & Media

World Cup Fever – GCG Sponsors Brisbane City FC

A significant portion of the GCG team are huge sports fans and of late there has been a large amount of World Cup banter circulating. This has ranged from obsessive fandom to bandwagon support – with the occasional well-natured discussion regarding the state of the dive in all professional sports. With the timezone difference between Russia and Australia not being favourable, coffee consumption is also up. It is timely then that…

News & Media

“How do I respond to a safety audit?”

Audits.  I know what you’re thinking…successive root canals for a week sounds more appealing.  But it doesn’t have to be like that, does it? The audit variables are almost endless.  Internal audits by corporate managers, external certification audits, government audits, pre-qualification audits, client audits, peer audits, and senior management audits – the list goes on.  What is the auditor like?  Is the auditor not fit to sharpen my pencil?  What…

Every day more people choose us, contact us today