Audits.  I know what you’re thinking…successive root canals for a week sounds more appealing.  But it doesn’t have to be like that, does it?

The audit variables are almost endless.  Internal audits by corporate managers, external certification audits, government audits, pre-qualification audits, client audits, peer audits, and senior management audits – the list goes on.  What is the auditor like?  Is the auditor not fit to sharpen my pencil?  What are the criteria, and will they be interpreted the same way as the last one (or me)?  Will corrective actions have consequences?  A sick day is sounding better and better.

Its a cliche, but preparation is key.  Know your criteria.  Research your auditor.  Map the criteria against your system.  Make sure the basics are there – access to your system documents and records, availability of key staff and management, even a decent selection of food and refreshments for the auditor and the team.

The audit is the audit – if you’ve prepared as well as you could have, you will get the result you deserve.  But Murphy was an optimist – and things go wrong, and you will get corrective actions.  The simple truth is that if you’re not getting any corrective actions you need to change auditors.

But how you respond to the audit result is where the magic needs to happen.  Regardless of your belief in the validity of the findings, it is your opportunity to make a difference to the management system within your organisation.  A couple of thoughts to consider are:

1.  Look at every issue systemically.  If a worker hasn’t completed a form properly, and the audit sample revealed enough non-compliance to result in a corrective action consider whether the form is necessary, or could the process be made simpler, or will a better understanding of the reason for the form facilitate improved completion?  Also, are the frequency requirements for completing the form, or the system triggers for the completion of the form right?  If there is no specific compliance requirement for the frequency and content of the form, don’t be afraid to relax system requirements, and make sure the system reflects the modified requirements.

2.  Consider taking things away.  Almost every audit corrective action response results in something being added to a system – either a ‘band-aid’ solution or a ‘bolt-on’ component that more often than not make the system worse off and less reliable, in order to get your name off that nasty corrective action register.  Make taking something away from your system your starting point, and work from there.  Simple areas might be the removal of motherhood statements that add no benefit, winding back requirements to complete aspects too regularly, or reducing the criteria of a form.  Even simple formatting improvements, or mapping a process to identify efficiencies can help.

3.  Listen to the team and encourage debate.  If you can’t reasonably justify why something is wrong or needs to change, then it probably needs to be re-assessed.  Don’t just fall back to ‘its the law’, as its often not (the difference between a should and a shall is well documented).  Don’t be afraid to fall on your sword, and say ‘I got this wrong team…how can we fix this?’

The team at GCG are here to help you keep your people safe.  Let us know if we can help.

News & Media

Cleaning and sanitisation basics for workplaces

Many businesses are currently in the process of refining or developing their business continuity plan around sanitisation and infection control measures and how to continue or restart operations while being impacted by a worldwide health crisis.  Management teams are implementing strategies to manage everything from communication with employees and managing remote operations, through to the implementation of disinfection procedures. A health crisis places businesses under increased pressure, and…

News & Media

Minimise Risk of COVID-19: Advice from Safe Work Australia

Safe Work Australia (SWA) is an Australian government statutory body established in 2008 for the purpose of developing national policy relating to workplace health and safety. A core function of SWA’s work is developing and maintaining an evidence base to inform workplace health and safety best practice, and minimise risk around work-related death, injury and illness. In early 2020, the World Health Organisation…

News & Media

Remote Assurance – Our New Process for Auditing

The current global health crisis is not only impacting our health, but it’s forcing all of us to change the way we do business. We have transformed our auditing process to reduce site based time. We have made this change to align with Government recommendations and to reduce the risk for our consultants and clients. Remote Assurance – Our New Process for Auditing and Assurance Works As one of Australia’s leading…

News & Media

Reduction of Workplace Exposure Standards for Silica and Coal Dust

Reduction of Workplace Exposure Standards for Silica and Coal Dust Australian Ministers recently agreed to reduce the workplace exposure standards (WES) for respirable coal dust and respirable crystalline silica to the levels that were proposed by Safe Work Australia (SWA) earlier in 2019. Background on the WES Review In 2018, SWA developed and documented a methodology to review the existing list from 1995 of adopted national exposure standards…

News & Media

Safe Work Australia: New Workplace Exposure Standard for Respirable Dust

Background of the new Workplace Exposure Standard for Respirable Dust On the 18 February 2019, Safe Work Australia (SWA) released two recommended workplace exposure standard (WES) values for Respirable Crystalline Silica, and Respirable Coal Dust, which will impact our clients who regularly deal with these forms of dust. The documents within the links above provide further detail regarding the current recommendations and basis for WES, discussions and conclusions, and some primary…

Every day more people choose us, contact us today